*

Version 6.5 of SEPA Cards Standardisation Volume is ready for public consultation

The European Payments Council (EPC) and the Cards Stakeholders Group (CSG) published version 6.5 of the Single European Payments Area (SEPA) Cards Standardisation Volume last week. The document defines a standard set of requirements to ensure an interoperable and scalable card and terminal infrastructure across SEPA. All market participants and interested parties are invited to provide feedback on the document. Based on the outcome of the public consultation, the CSG plans to release a stable version 7.0 in early 2014 for market implementation.

The development and maintenance of the Cards Standardisation Volume is the responsibility of the CSG. In 2009, the EPC promoted the creation of the CSG together with representatives from four other sectors (retailers, vendors, processors, card schemes). The initiative aims to remove technical obstacles to deliver a consistent customer payment card experience across SEPA. The work also encourages process efficiency throughout the card supply chain and the highest level of card payment security. Read more

The effects of SEPA exceed the eurozone

Anyone who thinks that the impact of SEPA is limited to eurozone, should think again. In fact, it is the surrounding countries who have intensive trade relationships with the eurozone who are welcoming the new international payment standard.

Organisations and consumers in countries like Poland, the Czech Republic and Hungary are already convinced of SEPA’s merits, according to Inge van Dijk, Head Product Management Payments at ING. SEPA allows them to transfer money to the eurozone faster and cheaper than is currently possible. Hungary for example is even using the XML standard to harmonise their domestic payment structure.

ING should know as the bank has subsidiaries in several countries outside the eurozone, including the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Bulgaria, Romania, Ukraine and Russia. “There is a lot of trade between these countries and the eurozone”, according to Van Dijk. “We see that they are much more eager to embrace SEPA than most countries in the eurozone.”  Read more

Belgium’s ambition to be the payments capital of Europe

It is hard to find a country that has more Europe in its DNA than Belgium. Its capital Brussels is considered the de facto hub of the European Union, having a long history of hosting the institutions of the European Union within its European Quarter.

It should therefore not come as a surprise that Belgian companies and banks primarily see SEPA as an opportunity. Peter Lagaert, Head of Cashless Payments Division of the National Bank of Belgium: “Historically, a lot of companies are headquartered in our country. By being a frontrunner in SEPA, we want to attract organisations to centralise their cash management in Belgium.”

On a scale of 1 to 5, how would you rate the implementation pace in Belgium (1 = worrying, 2 = slow but we will get there, 3 = could be better, 4 = satisfactory, 5 = good)?

Axelle Waterkeyn, SEPA Manager Belgium at the National Bank of Belgium (NBB): “I would say more than satisfactory, so probably between 4 and 5. On the SEPA Credit Transfer (SCT) level, we are now at an implementation rate of over 60 per cent. The migration of SCT is evolving steadily. It really helped that the Federal Government first migrated as it made citizens quickly familiar with their IBAN. However, as we are approaching the deadline, the adoption rate seems to slow down. We find it more difficult to reach small and medium enterprises (SMEs).”

Most small and medium sized companies in Belgium tend to rely on their Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software providers to facilitate the migration. Peter Lagaert: “Therefore we have reached out to these software vendors to encourage them to adapt their systems and communicate to the end users about it. We are actually very hopeful that they will have their products ready in Q3, although some banks fear that ERP vendors might use SEPA as an opportunity to force users to implement new versions of the software – which could possibly impose a lot of costs.”

The migration to SEPA Direct Debit (SDD) is still a bit slow, but the NBB expects a significant improvement in the coming months. “We managed to reach a migration rate of 10 to 20 per cent quite early, thanks to the migration of Electrabel, a large utility company. We expect more large users to migrate in the coming months, probably before the end of the third quarter. We are now having meetings with the top one hundred of the big billers in Belgium, who account for 80 per cent of the transactions.”

Mandate is a hurdle

An additional hurdle towards the implementation of SDD is the mandate system in Belgium. Peter Lagaert: “In our current system, a mandate is signed by the creditor and sent to his bank that manages all mandates. Within SEPA, companies are required to manage mandates, which is quite a challenge.”

Axelle Waterkeyn: “We knew in advance that our mandate system would make the transition towards SDD more difficult for us. We experienced that banks were actually preparing quite early for SDD. What makes life a bit easier is that we can continue to use current mandates, so there is no need to sign new ones.”

No delay, no waivers

The NBB and the banks have a clear message for all parties involved in the payments industry: there will be no delay and no waivers in Belgium. Peter Lagaert: “We actually receive quite a lot questions about delaying the SEPA implementation, but we always confirm that there is absolutely no discussion about that. The same goes for waivers. We are dedicated to adopting the SEPA standards, without any exceptions. For SEPA to really work, it should be as similar as possible in all participating countries.”

This attitude is perhaps influenced by the tradition of the Belgian banking industry as a European payments capital. “I can honestly say that Belgian banks are really frontrunners when it comes to SEPA. They want to take advantage of a single European payments market. Historically, a lot of companies have their headquarters in our country. By being a frontrunner in SEPA, we want to attract organisations to centralise their cash management in Belgium. That is why they our banks are so keen to make use of their very well prepared status on SEPA.”

Confident

Summarising, both experts are confident that the SCT migration rate will be close to 100 per cent by February 1, 2014. But it will be difficult to get the same result for SDD. “The banking sector in Belgium has been preparing for years. Actually, all the internet banking applications are already SEPA-proof. All banks are planning to fully migrate later this year, to make it mandatory to use of SCT version of credit transfer. Besides, banks are also planning to invest in e-mandate, because the current system to manage paper mandates is very costly. Since more and more consumers are purchasing on the Internet, it would be great to have a common e-mandate solution in place. This will be our next big thing.”

Finland: “Full SEPA benefits can only be gained when the migration has been fully completed” (part 2)

In a previous blog post Marianne Palva, Senior Advisor in the Financial Stability Department at the Bank of Finland, explained why Finland was an early SEPA adaptor. Since 2011 the nation is 100 per cent SEPA Credit Transfer (SCT) proof. In this post, Marianne Palva explains the role of the different stakeholders in the migration process and tells about the road ahead.

According to Marianne Palva the burden for consumers to migrate to SEPA wasn’t really high due to the help of the software providers. “The central Bank of Finland and the national forum on SEPA played an important role in the process.” The central bank is chairing the core group of the SEPA Stakeholder Forum in Finland. In addition, central bank representatives have tried to promote SEPA by giving presentations and writing articles on SEPA. The Bank of Finland has been organising a yearly Payments Forum since 2007. From 2009 onwards a SEPA Forum has been organised in conjunction with the Payments Forum. Read more

Finland: a SEPA showcase for other countries (part 1)

Finland has been 100 per cent SEPA Credit Transfer (SCT)-proof since 2011, long before the deadline of February 1st in 2014. Why did Finland feel the need to migrate as soon as possible? Marianne Palva, Senior Advisor in the Financial Stability Department at the Bank of Finland, explains in this first blog post why Finland was an early SEPA adaptor and the problems it had to overcome. In the next blog post she will expand on the role of the different stakeholders in the migration process.

Marianne Palva primarily works on issues related to financial market infrastructures and payments. She also represents the bank of Finland in the Payment and Settlement Systems Committee of the Eurosystem & European System of Central banks (PSSC) and is chairing the core group of the SEPA stakeholder forum in Finland. Saying that she knows SEPA very well is an understatement. Read more

SEPA traffic lights are not green yet

‘Unacceptable’. There, the word is out. The European Central Bank (ECB) has started using fiercer language to pinpoint the worrisome adoption rate of SEPA Direct Debit (SDD).

According to Banking Technology the ECB is especially concerned that the lack of preparation will damage the reputation of the SEPA scheme: ‘Given the popularity of legacy direct debit payment instrument in certain countries and the challenges associated with the new SDD collection process, the current situation is unacceptable.’ In the recently published Report on the Migration towards the single European Payments Area, the ECB urges regulators and payment service providers to make greater efforts to push the instrument to the market.

Read more

ECB: Financial turmoil is temporary, SEPA is here to stay

This is the second part of two articles in which Wiebe Ruttenberg, Head of Market Integration Division at the European Central Bank (ECB), is interviewed regarding the role of the ECB in the transition to SEPA.

Ruttenberg believes that the current economic climate has had its effect on the preparation pace. “Especially from a bank’s perspective, SEPA is a huge project which affects certain revenue streams. In other words, the move costs a lot of money now and the benefits will only follow later. Currently board of directors of banks are often more occupied with solving day-to-day problems due to the financial turmoil than with establishing a strategic view on future service offerings. This makes it hard to get commitment. On the other hand, we see examples of banks that are capable to succeed in this. The current financial turmoil is only temporary and cannot serve as an excuse for not planning and preparing for tomorrow. Therefore it’s impossible to even think that we postpone the start of SEPA. The migration end date has really helped to push things forward, so there is no reason not to stick with it.” Read more

ECB: Many advantages of SEPA already exist

“It is a general misconception that the migration to SEPA will be completed on February 1, 2014,” says Wiebe Ruttenberg, Head of Market Integration Division at the European Central Bank (ECB). “On that date we will have ‘only’ completed the migration to SEPA Credit Transfer and SEPA Direct Debit within the Euro area. This means that only two out of the three most important cashless payment instruments will be harmonised by then. The harmonisation of certain standards and business rules for card payments will occur after that date and be another important milestone. The harmonisation of Internet and mobile payments should not be forgotten either.

In February 2014 we are taking a huge step to build a foundation for SEPA and we will continue to develop it further.

Ruttenberg’s division manages the integration of the retail payments market in Europe. The ECB is like a spider in the web of all the national central banks in the Euro zone. Needless to say that SEPA is high on the agenda of the ECB these days. Read more

Milestone for Equens: one billion SEPA transactions processed

Equens, the largest pan-European payment processor, reached the magical number of one billion SEPA transactions last week. This is a very impressive number and one that we are very proud of, here at Equens. However, this volume also shows that the market is not yet fully prepared for the transition to SEPA. With the deadline of February 1st 2014 approaching quickly, we know that there is still some work to do.

Since the introduction of SEPA Credit Transfer (SCT) in January 2008 and the introduction of SEPA Direct Debit (SDD) in November 2009, the number of SEPA transactions has strongly increased. Although Equens’ systems were fully prepared for large SEPA payment volumes from the first day, it still took almost five years to reach the one billion milestone. Read more

‘Corporate treasurers should have been consulted sooner’

Corporate treasurers are one of the main end users of SEPA. The European Association of Corporate Treasurers (EACT) represents this group on a European level. According to EACT representative Olivier Brissaud treasurers should have been much more involved in the development of SEPA standards.

1. First, what is EACT?

“EACT is a virtual organisation. We have no paid staff and all board members have regular jobs – including myself, as the Managing Director at Volkswagen Group Services. Nevertheless, when we speak, we do have a voice and opinion about the market’s needs. Recently, EACT has been particularly vocal around some financial regulations and we aim to continue these discussions around SEPA and its standards.

2. Is EACT actively involved in providing information about SEPA to its members?

“There is quite a lot of information about SEPA already available. If our members are looking for information, there are several places where they can find it. However, I believe that banks and public administration offices should be much more proactive in informing their customers about SEPA. In many countries, SEPA still is not a hot topic. Customers should put some pressure on banks.”

Read more